The 20th (until 21st) of June, my sleepless supposed-to-be-sleeping time was spent switching between radio stations, and my music player. I came across this show on the radio (think it's called, "Playground, with DJ Guile and The Big Daddy") on Magic 89.9, show's got nothing to do with what I want to talk about, but, they did play this song by Taylor Swift, "You Belong With Me" (click HERE so you could listen to this song, if you haven't heard of it yet). It's a pretty cool song, so I listened to the lyrics well. After hearing the song for the first time, I was all, like, "Sweet. Another 'I know you really like this far superior person than me but that person treats you like trash and I think you don't deserve the pain you're trying to endure with putting up with that far superior person at all so why not just settle with the one that really loves you and will care about you for the rest of your life? ME.' This song's totally awesome!", I really like the song! But the next one didn't interest me at all so I switched back to my music player. I have all of my songs played on random, so I won't know the next song that will play next. When I switched back and hit play, I heard this song by FM Static, "Defintely Maybe" (click HERE so you could listen to this song, if you haven't heard of it yet). But something hit me when the next song played. It's "Better Off" by Typecast (click HERE so you could listen to this song, if you haven't heard of it yet). I noticed the similarities between the three songs, the common message that those three songs bring about to the listeners. Come on, listen to them, I'll give you a moment (at least 'til you get to the next paragraph) to think about what that common message is.
Have an idea yet? Okay, I'll delay it no more.
Not all people... Wait, no.
Every animal has his own set of preferences, especially humans, we all know that. But not all preference could be supported by life. People can have parallel desires, but for every major desire, there is always at least one perpendicular to it. Nobody could get everything he desires without voiding another's desire. Exempli gratia,"1" could want "a", but "2" could also want "a" as much, so if "1" gets "a", that said desire of "2" of "a" could not be granted because "1" already has "a", or "a" could just simply not want "1" back, with that said, "a" wants the said desire of "1" to be void. You don't get it, do you? Well, it's okay, it's kind of an unclear explanation anyways. To make it all crystal clear to everybody, I'm talking about conflicting desires. Say, I want you, but you don't want me, instead you want him. Simple as that. I know, it happens all the time.
Specifically, I would like to emphasize on the conflicting desires when it comes to choosing your partner. Not only I, myself, is facing this kind of problem, but also other people, almost everybody, really. Now, I know that the world as we know it, is built, and meant, to be unfair, but mankind is just too stubborn to seek equality. Sometimes, I have considered providing equality to the ones who seek it, but what about equality for me? Must one give up the risk of not obtaining equality for oneself, for sustaining equality for another that seeks equality in him, considering that if he chooses to reciprocate, there'll be a great chance of satisfaction for both parties?
To break it down for most people, and to apply to my personal experiences, I, myself, has fallen to the clutches of the most destructive, and most common mental state, the rough opposite of evil ('evol', actually, you get it, don't you?), once (for quite a long time, perhaps too long), but on the way, it reciprocated, but in the form of other people. Yes, people. You heard, er, read, it right. No need to break it down for you some more, since it's already that obvious. See where I'm going with this? Going back to the common message of the three songs, you must really know what I mean here, by now.
Have you ever had a (HUGE!) crush on somebody you think you don't have a chance (I mean, NO CHANCE IN HELL, man, or so you thought) in having a successful relationship with, not even much to start with? Have you ever discovered that somebody else actually has a (huge, maybe) crush on you, either with nothing much to start with, or possesses a huge stepping stone into you but you don't (want to) really reciprocate to this (or these) person(s)'s feelings towards you? If you answered "yes" (or something close enough) to both questions, have you ever considered giving that (or any of those) somebody else a chance to get closer to you, trying to reciprocate as much as possible because you think it's the better choice?
I was trying not to think about any of those B.S.* at all then, but now that I've got this solid idea about this, and the proper inspirations for this post, I'm just going to talk about this now. And guess what, if I would've answered to all of those three questions I've just raised, I'd say "yes" to all. What about you?
Well, I just thought it's time to talk about B.S.* like that, since I'm already turning 19 in 24 days, and I've never had any actual experience at all in the actual [evil] matter (yet, I'm not really any innocent about it, or better yet, I know an F-ing lot about it already), YET.
* B.S. = Bull Sh-t
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Real serious stuff. Totally...
AWESOME.
+CLXXXI
No comments:
Post a Comment